All Issue

2019 Vol.21, Issue 2

Research Paper

A comparative study on the numerical analysis program by SSI analysis of a high-rise building and an adjacent underground structure

초고층 건물과 인접지하구조물의 SSI 해석을 통한 수치해석 프로그램 비교 연구

Kwang-Ho You1*
유 광호1*
1Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Suwon
1정회원, 수원대학교 건설환경공학과 교수
* Corresponding Author
31 March 2019. pp. 211-225
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Recently, earthquakes have occurred throughout the entire region of Korea and seismic analysis studies have been actively conducted in various fields. SSI analyses studies considering ground have been carried out consistently. However, few comparative analyses have been performed on the dynamic behavior of buildings according to numerical analysis method in the case of the previous dynamic analyses considering grounds. Therefore, in this study, the dynamic analyses were performed on a high-rise building by using both a finite element program MIDAS GTS NX and a finite difference program FLAC 2D. The results were compared and analyzed each other. As a result, both the maximum compressive and tensile bending stresses of above ground and below ground part were estimated to be a little larger by MIDAS GTS NX than by FLAC 2D. However, the maximum horizontal displacement value, the horizontal displacement distribution, and the position of weak part were turned out to be similar in both analysis programs. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no difference in using either a finite element program or a finite difference program for the convenience of a user for a dynamic analysis.

Keywords
Finite element method
Finite difference method
SSI
High-rise building

최근 우리나라 전 지역에서 지진이 발생하고 이에 각 분야에서의 내진해석 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있고 지반을 고려하는 SSI 해석 연구 또한 지속적으로 수행되고 있다. 하지만 지반을 고려한 대부분의 기존 동적해석의 경우, 수치해석 방법에 따른 건물의 동적거동에 대한 비교 ‧ 분석이 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 초고층 건물을 대상으로 유한요소 프로그램인 MIDAS GTS NX와 유한차분 프로그램인 FLAC 2D를 사용하여 동적해석을 수행하고, 결과를 비교 ‧ 분석하고자하였다. 연구 결과, 건물 지상 및 지하부의 휨응력의 경우 최대 압축 및 인장 모두 MIDAS GTS NX가 FLAC 2D보다 다소 크게 발생하였지만, 최대 수평변위값 및 분포양상, 취약부의 위치는 유사하게 나타났다. 따라서 동적해석을 위해 사용자의 편의에 따라 유한요소법이나 유한차분법에 근거한 프로그램 중 어느 것을 사용해도 차이가 없음을 확인하였다.

키워드
유한요소법
유한차분법
지반-구조물 상호작용
초고층 건물
References
1
Hwang, T.H. (2000), A comparative study between finite element method and finite difference method on variation of lateral earth pressure in NATM tunnel analysis, Master's Degree, Dankook University Graduate School, Dankook University, pp. 54.
2
Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2005), Fast lagrangian analysis of continua, Ver. 5.0, Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minnesota, USA.
3
Kim, D.G. (2013), Dynamics of structures, Goomibook, Seoul, pp. 779.
4
Koo, H.J., Kim, H.J. (2015), "Natural period and damping ratio of RC buildings for serviceability design", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure and Construction, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 37-44.
10.5659/JAIK_SC.2015.31.2.37
5
Lysmer, J., Kuhlemeyer, R.L. (1969), "Finite dynamic model for infinite media", Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 859-877.
6
MIDAS Information Technology Co. (2012), MIDAS CIVIL user manual, MIDAS Information Technology Co., Korea, pp. 551.
7
MIDAS Information Technology Co. (2016), MIDAS GTS NX user manual, MIDAS Information Technology Co., Korea, pp. 445.
8
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2016), Concrete standard specification, pp. 358.
9
National Disaster Management Research Institute (2012), Development of the public buildings emergency integrity assessment technology using seismic acceleration response signal, National Disaster Management Research Institute, Korea, pp. 253.
10
Park, S.S., Moon, H.D., Park, S.H. (2015), "A study on dynamic analyses of cut and cover tunnel during earthquakes", The Korean Society of Engineering Geology, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 237-250.
11
Son, S.H. (2012), An analysis of effect of vibration in urban tunnel blasting, Master's Degree, Inha University Graduate School, Inha University, pp. 49.
12
Western Metro (2016), Final design of private infrastructure investment project on ○○-○○ double track railway (zone 4), Tunnel Analysis Report, pp. 906.
13
You, K.H., Kim, Y.J. (2018), "A preliminary numerical analysis study on the seismic stability of a building and underground structure by using SSI", Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 23-38.
14
You, K.H., Park, Y.J., Hong, K.Y., Lee, H.K., Kim, J.K. (2005), "Numerical estimation for safety factors of tunnels considering the failure of supports", Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 37-49.
10.9711/KTAJ.2012.14.1.037
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국터널지하공간학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
  • Volume : 21
  • No :2
  • Pages :211-225
  • Received Date : 2018-11-26
  • Revised Date : 2018-12-27
  • Accepted Date : 2019-01-03
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.2.211
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close